Welcome to the second follow-up event of the Social Tools 2018 conference. Since new practices cannot be established during a weekend workshop we decided to host six separate training sessions. The program for the sessions will be based on the "12 Patterns of Decentralized Organizing" as outlined by Natalie Lombardo and Rich Bartlett (Enspiral/Loomio) in their workshop, which took place at the 2018 Social Tools Conference.
Session 3 will focus on Patterns 11+12: "Use Rhythm to Align Autonomy" and "Find Your Own Patterns With Regular Retrospective".
The six sessions will furthermore outline and develop the program strands for the second Social Tools Conference in Helsinki. Taking place in the last weekend of September we try to establish cross-pollination with two events that take place shortly before, the MyData conference and DareToLearn. The core Social Tools team are Pixelache members Owen Kelly, Oliver Kotcha-Kalleinen, Agnieszka Pokrywka, Ilpo Heikkinen, Andrew Paterson.
The event is intended as a peer learning session where we will exchange experiences and practices from our different backgrounds. We will do some exercises and deepen our understanding of the patterns. The session will conclude with a Case Clinic. These sessions are open to anyone – not only Social Tools conference participants. Some refreshments will be provided.
TIME
Monday, March 25, 2019
17:30 PM – 20:30 EET
LOCATION
Pixelache
Kaasutehtaankatu 1/21
Suvilahti - Building 7
00540 Helsinki
Please check this image to find the correct entrance:
http://socialtools.us/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/pixelache_office.jpg
TICKETS AVAILABLE FROM: Eventbrite
CONTACT
oliver.kalleinen@gmail.com
+358408223552
www.socialtools.us
Related content
Convivial
In 1971 Ivan Illich, the activist philosopher, suggested that to
formulate a theory about a future society both very modern and not dominated by industry, it will be necessary to recognize natural scales and limits. Once these limits are recognized, it becomes possible to articulate the triadic relationship between persons, tools, and a new collectivity. Such a society, in which modern technologies serve politically interrelated individuals rather than managers, I will call “convivial.”
He wrote that he chose
the term “conviviality” to designate the...